February 26, 2010

America is so "troubled"...

Even though the US is supposedly "troubled" by the Syrian-Iranian love affair, that did not prevent it from appointing a new ambassador to Syria..

And even though the US is "troubled" by Iranian influence in Iraq, that did not prevent it from siding with its parties and  militias in the invasion, occupation, ethnic cleansing and segregation/partition  of Iraq and produce a formidable sectarian Shiite pseudo-state.

Nor did the US army have any problem whatsoever cordoning off the Green Zone for Ahmadinejad's, Rafsanjani's and Larijani's visits in the heart of U.S occupied Baghdad.

Nor does the US have any problem in having Southern Iraq become an Iranian enclave nor does the US have any problem in Iran's aiding the Kurdish Regional Government and its militia the Peshmergas, a question of finishing off the ethnic cleansing that is taking place in the North of the country. And as expected, a longer stay of US troops in Iraq despite claims of a withdrawal...

And even though the US is "troubled" with Iran's growing regional influence and its nuclear development, nothing will happen and Iran is constructing more plants...

And even though the US is "troubled" by Iran's role in the Gulf, it had absolutely no problems calling upon its collaboration in the "war on terror" in Afghanistan and Pakistan...

Who does the US think it's fooling here ?! Give us a break with your old stale psy-ops, no Iraqi believes your shit.